Reading through my first 3 reflections is an
interesting exercise, it brings back some thought processes I thought I had
worked through and figured out somehow, but as I read back, more questions pop
up in my mind.
I just had the sudden realization that curriculum
is much more fluid and flexible than I ever had thought of at the beginning of
this class. As I wrote in my first
reflection, I had a very limited understanding and grasp of curriculum studies
when I entered this program. Through the
readings in The Curriculum Studies Reader and getting acquainted with
curriculum scholars and their theories, I came to see that there is no perfect
curriculum theory that can encompass all the needs of my students and support
their learning, but if I combine some of the theories and thoughts, I
could create a flexible curriculum,
which might give me a chance at
successfully implementing a style of teaching more adapted to the needs of my 3
courses..
I am thinking the difficult part would be to stay
true and respectful of the belief system already in place at Langara College
and in the Registered Massage Therapy education community. At the moment, there is a thought that to be
a Registered Massage Therapist (RMT) you must be very orthopedically oriented,
this involves a rigid set of assessment skills including testing strength,
mobility and sensory functions of each patient, almost regardless of why they
came into the clinic in the first place.
We have patients coming into our school clinic
with complaints of fatigue and headaches clearly related to their stress levels
being out of control, and our students are instructed to do a postural
examination, pick a joint and do a full set of testing and range of motion
observations and then give a possible diagnosis for this patient. This makes no sense, we are basically asking
the students to force a patient into admitting to a pretend injury or
dysfunction, and then diagnose it properly.
All the while, there is a very real patient with a very real complaint
that needs attention, but we are creating a situation where our students are
taught to ignore this reality. The
students then miss out on a learning opportunity and a chance to truly connect
with another human being in a deep and therapeutic way.
As I write this, I am acutely aware that if any
of my coworkers at Langara would read this, they would probably quickly point
out how ironic this is, being that I have been hired at Langara College
specifically because of my expertise in
teaching the orthopedic content of the RMT program, yes, I admit it, I am the
one creating these super orthopedically oriented future RMTs. Yet I am a firm believer that what I teach is
only a small portion of what a Registered Massage Therapist actually treats in
a full day’s worth of work, but for some reason, our community of RMTs have
glommed onto this section of our education as if it is the greatest and most
important component. There is a belief
that the more orthopedically oriented you are as an RMT the higher your value
and you become instantly more respected as a practitioner of “true” health
care.
Therefore, RMT education puts a great amount of
emphasis on orthopedic teaching, and I teach 3 of the 4 classes dedicated to
this subject.
In my experience, which is 20 years worth of
clinical work, the majority of my clients are seeking RMT treatments for
conditions that are non-orthopedic, mostly stress related like fatigue,
headaches, depression, anxiety.
Unspecific pain and discomfort are more common than any of orthopedic conditions
I teach. I rarely use any of the testing
I teach my students because they are not appropriate or will in no way help the
course of treatment and healing of my patients.
What I truly do in clinic is be there for my
patients, listen to them and let them off-load, make them laugh, show them some
compassion and allow them to just be themselves for an hour. They think I am treating their knee, their
low back, their neck and shoulders, but in reality I am aiming at treating
their battered souls. Their emotions and
stresses are oozing out of their body in the form of physical injury, I can
treat their ankle sprain until the cows come home, but if I don’t address their
stress levels, I can guarantee they will be back with the same injury within a
very short period of time.
So in short, what I would really like to impart
on my students is that orthopedics are great, but not the end-all-be-all of
massage therapy. The lessons they learn
in their professional development(PD) classes and in their Pain, Stress and
Sleep(PSS) classes will be much more valuable than anything I will ever teach
them in my Spinal Orthopedics class. Yet
these PD and PSS classes are despised by
the students, and thought of as a waste of time by both students and a good
majority of the teachers. Teachers are
made fun of for being assigned these classes.
I taught PSS for a few semesters and I loved it,
but I did not have enough knowledge to truly go into the subject in depth with
the students. I truly wish I had read
Rita Charon’s work at that time, it would have been so helpful, and would have
given me the vocabulary and the tools to properly teach subjects like chronic
pain, depression and anxiety. I am
not-so secretly wishing I get assigned to PSS classes again in the future…
Reading and working through Narrative Medicine
from Rita Charon has opened a great door for me in my career, both as an RMT
and as a teacher. I had that nagging
feeling for years that what I was teaching was not as important as our
community of RMTs seem to believe it is, and that there was a greater purpose
to our work than joint mobilization and ligament testing. I unfortunately did not have to words to
express these feelings, nor did I have the information to back up these beliefs
of mine. Reading Rita Charon’s work and
then digging deeper into her resources and reference books, articles and
research, I have been introduced to a depth of knowledge to tap into.
I have been feverishly reading and incorporating
this new information into my world, probably to a point where my coworkers now
think I am annoying and way too obsessed
with this woman’s work. I see this as
part of the normal excitement that comes with knowledge acquisition, it’s a
good thing, and I am aware it will pass, but hope it will leave a great
indelible mark on me, my work and hopefully my students.
I am trying really hard to impart on my students
the thirst of learning, questioning and seeking more from their education that
just the basic hands on skills gathering.
Hopefully, my enthusiasm rubs off on them, even just a little bit!