What does curriculum mean to me?
My theoretical knowledge and
experience of curriculum creating and understanding is very limited at the
moment. For the last 12 years, I have
been teaching in a field, Registered Massage Therapy schools, which is very
regimented in terms of curriculum. We
are bound by the competency document that our professional College, the College
of Massage Therapists of British Columbia (CMTBC) has set out for entry to practice
examinations. All of our students must
meet a specific set of criterias in order to be eligible to write the entry to
practice exams which will allow them to work under the title of Registered
Massage Therapists ( RMT) in British Columbia.
Schools also must prove that they teach each competencies in order to be
accredited with the CMTBC, without this accreditation, students graduating from
a school would not be eligible to write the entry to practice exams.
This has lead to RMT schools
“bunching” competencies in groups of similar goals or skill levels and then
creating classes around this grouping.
When a teacher is assigned a class, they are given the specific set of
competencies assigned to that class and number of classes/hours this must be
accomplished in. Most classes are very
regimented by the time a new instructor comes along. When I started 12 years ago as a TA, the head
instructor had been teaching for close to 20 years the same 3 courses, he had
his ways of teaching and proceeded to teach me the “right way” of covering the
material. Don’t get me wrong, he was an
excellent instructor and I am very happy I learned from him, but it did limit
creativity and new thoughts. When I
officially took over his classes, I had no experience of curriculum other than
his.
Langara college started an RMT program
in 2014, and it was exciting to be part of the start of a program, have a say
in how we could set the curriculum with a more productive and student learning
focus. When I received my set of
competencies and a vague outline of how I was expected to organize this
particular grouping, I was able, for the first time to really look at my material
and decide how I could best deliver this information to the students. I unfortunately had no references,
experiences or event the imagination to create anything different from what I
already knew.
Since starting this Master’s program,
I have slowly started to change some of my classes to incorporate better
teaching methods and more supportive language and instruction for my
students. Already, I am investigating a
very different approach to testing and exam writing for my students this
semester, and planning to revamp my Septembre classes over the summer.
I am truly enjoying the readings I
have gone through so far and taking in as much as I can to instruct my future
curriculum planning. My hope is that I
will find “gems” and a guiding thought to grow my teaching and bring about more
critical thinking and integration of knowledge for my students.
The Rita Charron book, Narrative
Medicine; Honoring the Stories of Illness, has been transforming my private
practice and how I work and communicate with my patients. I am finding my voice, allowing me to reach
my patients at a deeper level than just “where is the pain?” now I am looking more into “why is there
pain?” and “what is behind this pain?”.
I have noticed a change in my patient's’ words and chatter as I treat
them, and we discuss the deeper meaning of pain and discomfort. I also am finding a renewed sense of
enjoyment in my private practice since incorporating these changes, I am more
satisfied with my relationship to my clients and the results I am getting
through my work.
Maybe I am too hopeful or demanding of
the class readings, but having no formal education in the field of education, I
am really looking forward to some base knowledge to support my work as a
teacher, and looking to the class readings as a door to this knowledge.
No comments:
Post a Comment